xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2/9] xfs: convert internal buffer functions to pass maps

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] xfs: convert internal buffer functions to pass maps
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 02:04:00 -0400
Cc: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20120620055619.GA30705@dastard>
References: <1339133914-11148-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1339133914-11148-3-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120618204325.GX4721@xxxxxxx> <20120618210713.GY4721@xxxxxxx> <20120619071552.GA23093@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120619155946.GA2676@xxxxxxx> <20120619170304.GC7554@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120619171153.GD2676@xxxxxxx> <20120620055619.GA30705@dastard>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 03:56:19PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > they are rebased not to require the inode allocator patchset.  I think that 
> > Jan
> > is also going to repost his 'Fix overallocation in 
> > xfs_buf_allocate_memory()'
> > based upon Dave's suggestions.  It's best not to depend upon that either.  
> > What
> > do you say, Dave?
> 
> I reorder my local patch set and repost it after running it through
> some testing....

Sorry, I totally misunderstood the initial issue - I though Ben had my
series applied, and thus yours didn't apply.

I still think reordering is better - I'm quite busy and I'd rather get
your series reviewed first before redoing and retesting the inode
allocator changes.

In fact I'll start reviewing them in about 10 minutes after I've
finished catching up on email for this morning.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>