xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2/9] xfs: convert internal buffer functions to pass maps

To: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/9] xfs: convert internal buffer functions to pass maps
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:56:19 +1000
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20120619171153.GD2676@xxxxxxx>
References: <1339133914-11148-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1339133914-11148-3-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120618204325.GX4721@xxxxxxx> <20120618210713.GY4721@xxxxxxx> <20120619071552.GA23093@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120619155946.GA2676@xxxxxxx> <20120619170304.GC7554@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120619171153.GD2676@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 12:11:53PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> Hey Christoph,
> 
> On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 01:03:05PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:59:46AM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> > > How long before the inode allocator redo?  Maybe it would be best if 
> > > Dave's
> > > buffer cache changes are rebased not to depend upon the inode allocator
> > > changes?
> > 
> > I'll need some time to get back to it.  I'd rather like to get the
> > buffer changes in ASAP as a lot of work depends on them.
> 
> In that case I think we'll be able to get the buffer changes in more quickly 
> if
> they are rebased not to require the inode allocator patchset.  I think that 
> Jan
> is also going to repost his 'Fix overallocation in xfs_buf_allocate_memory()'
> based upon Dave's suggestions.  It's best not to depend upon that either.  
> What
> do you say, Dave?

I reorder my local patch set and repost it after running it through
some testing....

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>