| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: block sizes > 4K ?? possible w/large page support? |
| From: | Stefan Ring <stefanrin@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 11 Jun 2012 23:25:45 +0200 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=eSzy8PlokvLzuwduXOZS7ALbWaWtqgw6fRdkKBHDwjw=; b=PCuds7hBZdXPvza0bXAUwY5nPd7vOkM2K8HYHLiOsNexIahJoiEmG/cSgwonpm0zfD /ZckSx0Ys134A3IkxZ1G9JhQt8GSu3GOYjugaV0W1F3hm+0A1n09VtyeDthDUXo2TnhI NEk54I8cTYN13lemTSohYS9tJ0zHbeRl8U7pkE/0xyaHOsaWaJ3m9gRu/KDfwdAUtAWn JXXjq6dnVJ327iglCTeZ9d7wuiRT17HeaLZIe5CgM9REXtrVF5dTIfdGgEHKGaXQ3H24 Y7vv27W4j3GoG8HiLkdJjsvXWzoBLjbVaNXBprQLXC/h2+6XpjPN5kSf9B89rocQEYPq Bm1Q== |
| In-reply-to: | <20120611162102.GB18432@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4FD5643F.5070801@xxxxxxxxx> <20120611132932.GA18432@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4FD606C1.1070103@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120611162102.GB18432@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
> I know we can use hugepages with these sizes, but didn't know we can use this > as > common usage. I tried to look at MM code and didn't find anything which would > make PAGE_SIZE greater than 4096 (at least in x86), but well, I'm not a MM > developer too. Me neither, but so much I think I know. With rather recent kernels, huge pages are used automatically for "normal" memory. There's a background thread that tries to locate or create adjacent blocks of memory and create huge pages from these. But the normal page size as a unit of allocation is still 4KB, and this will never change (with the current hardware). The page size of 4KB is hard-wired into the architecture, and I'm not aware of any extension that allows to change that. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: shutdown xfs_sync_worker before the log, Mark Tinguely |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | XFS hangs and freezes with LSI 9265-8i controller on high i/o, Matthew Whittaker-Williams |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: block sizes > 4K ?? possible w/large page support?, Carlos Maiolino |
| Next by Thread: | Re: block sizes > 4K ?? possible w/large page support?, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |