xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfstest 285: userspace vs. fragmented multiblock dir2

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstest 285: userspace vs. fragmented multiblock dir2
From: Eric Sandeen <esandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2012 20:57:58 -0400 (EDT)
Cc: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20120605234803.GE22848@dastard>
References: <4FBABC41.5040001@xxxxxxxxxx> <20120605224600.GN4721@xxxxxxx> <20120605234803.GE22848@dastard>
On Jun 5, 2012, at 6:48 PM, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 05:46:00PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
>> Hey Eric,
>> 
>> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 05:05:53PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> Current xfs_repair is unhappy with fragmented multiblock
>>> v2 directories.  This test shows it ... patches to fix
>>> it soon to follow.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> This failed on my system... looks like it's just PEBKAC.  My partitions
>> are too small?
>> 
>> # ./check 287
>> No patches applied
>> KERNEL_TOPDIR -- /root/xfs
>> BRANCH        -- refs/heads/master2
>> DESC          -- v3.4-10158-gf8f5701
>> PATCHES:
>> FSTYP         -- xfs (debug)
>> PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 nfs10 3.5.0-rc1-0.7-default+
>> MKFS_OPTIONS  -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/sdb4
>> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdb4 /mnt/scratch
>> 
>> 287      - no qualified output
> 
> It failed because there is not 287.out file in the patch. Every test
> has to have a golden image to compare the result against...
> 
Argh.....

Sorry.


> Cheers,
> 
> Dave.
> -- 
> Dave Chinner
> david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>