xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] xfstest 285: userspace vs. fragmented multiblock dir2

To: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] xfstest 285: userspace vs. fragmented multiblock dir2
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2012 09:48:03 +1000
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20120605224600.GN4721@xxxxxxx>
References: <4FBABC41.5040001@xxxxxxxxxx> <20120605224600.GN4721@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 05:46:00PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> Hey Eric,
> 
> On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 05:05:53PM -0500, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> > Current xfs_repair is unhappy with fragmented multiblock
> > v2 directories.  This test shows it ... patches to fix
> > it soon to follow.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> This failed on my system... looks like it's just PEBKAC.  My partitions
> are too small?
> 
> # ./check 287
> No patches applied
> KERNEL_TOPDIR -- /root/xfs
> BRANCH        -- refs/heads/master2
> DESC          -- v3.4-10158-gf8f5701
> PATCHES:
> FSTYP         -- xfs (debug)
> PLATFORM      -- Linux/x86_64 nfs10 3.5.0-rc1-0.7-default+
> MKFS_OPTIONS  -- -f -bsize=4096 /dev/sdb4
> MOUNT_OPTIONS -- /dev/sdb4 /mnt/scratch
> 
> 287      - no qualified output

It failed because there is not 287.out file in the patch. Every test
has to have a golden image to compare the result against...

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>