xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 1/2] types.h: implement intptr_t and uintptr_t

To: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] types.h: implement intptr_t and uintptr_t
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@xxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 31 May 2012 20:05:54 +0200 (CEST)
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, joe@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20120531175913.GH4721@xxxxxxx>
References: <20120525103758.GD1707@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1337961147-11668-1-git-send-email-jengelh@xxxxxxx> <1337961147-11668-2-git-send-email-jengelh@xxxxxxx> <20120531175913.GH4721@xxxxxxx>
Sender: jengelh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Alpine 2.01 (LNX 1266 2009-07-14)
On Thursday 2012-05-31 19:59, Ben Myers wrote:

>Hey Jan,
>
>On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 05:52:26PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
>> intptr_t and uintptr_t designate an (un)signed integer type capable of
>> holding void* pointers.
>> (http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/000095399/basedefs/stdint.h.html )
>
>Would it be appropriate to CC linux-kernel on this one given the nature of the
>change?

Occurred now.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>