| To: | stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: A little RAID experiment |
| From: | Stefan Ring <stefanrin@xxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 30 May 2012 13:07:00 +0200 |
| Cc: | Linux fs XFS <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=el6u54nD1Ql6HCURMk3IxaVLP8b+cSRQ08bMJlps9vU=; b=YKnKcPXetxbPp7ob9G8+GGaJySGjqHr1R3kPYTKTmdDYDVGH/QaGYy3c4W8pPNsroZ bsW9y+sP+aML11xTQ3Ibp1J3Rqm/r/R02nN1Gq1YWM2BPP1imsnD8KinR0ULov073k+G UqtSLAfSkeCJ6Ryv+eYJ8+kwlIerceFpJbQ1n8D0kA9Ahy24vqDzCWt5oqWPjeZ5/7I7 6s7C54E/UVowXPJo2+NJnq0OJ3IH66mn7SIQENt7yfXyAM/i35j0TYVT/LL2SsfTLPoj f96c4gVzCWQzNEhJmNn5vGUdk8Mw/DR2SgZeVZOkzAF/tWEdJXFVMEX9uhtrdfqZMkmX 3dRA== |
| In-reply-to: | <CAAxjCEzzMk0TFKy23cAA_cAxbUFLS6cOCjgRBQocDUNtJO2UnA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <CAAxjCEzh3+doupD=LmgqSbCeYWzn9Ru-vE4T8tOJmoud+28FDQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F9AA43A.1060509@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAAxjCEzzMk0TFKy23cAA_cAxbUFLS6cOCjgRBQocDUNtJO2UnA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:46 PM, Stefan Ring <stefanrin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Stefan, you should be able to simply clear the P410i configuration in >> the BIOS, power down, then simply connect the 6 drive backplane cable to >> the 410i, load the config from the disks, and go. This allows head to >> head RAID6 comparison between the P400 and P410i. No doubt the 410i >> will be quicker. This procedure will tell you how much quicker. > > Unfortunately, the server is located at a hosting facility at the > opposite end of town, and I'd spend an entire day just traveling to > and fro, so that's not currently an option. I might get lucky though, > because we should soon get another server with an external P410i. The new storage blade has only been upgraded to the P410i controller, and even though there is a new setting called "elevatorsort", which is enabled, the performance is just as bad. The new one has a flash-writeback cache and may be faster by a few percent ticks, but that's it. It doesn't even make sense to compare the two in-depth, as they perform almost identically. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests 016: Do not discard blocks at the mkfs time, more verbose version, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 00/10] xfs: discontiguous buffer support a.k.a. die xfs_dabuf die, Ben Myers |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: A little RAID experiment, Stefan Ring |
| Next by Thread: | Re: A little RAID experiment, Stan Hoeppner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |