| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests 016: Do not discard blocks at the mkfs time, more verbose version |
| From: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 29 May 2012 11:54:31 -0500 |
| Cc: | Boris Ranto <branto@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20111028095354.GA1062@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1319625983.3074.28.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <be02ada1-aee5-406d-84cd-d54dde7ae871@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111028095354.GA1062@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1 |
On 10/28/11 4:53 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 05:38:06AM -0400, Boris Ranto wrote: >> The test 016 fills scratch device with some data and then creates xfs fs >> on the scratch device. Later, the test assumes that the previously >> written data are still written there and checks for them at specific >> locations. On ssd drive this will lead to a failure since the blocks are >> discarded by default when the mkfs command is run. >> This is a more verbose version of the previous patch. >> This simple patch that adds -K to stop the discarding (if the mkfs >> command supports it) fixed the issue for me: >> >> Signed-off-by: Boris Ranto <branto@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Looks good, > > Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> Seems this one got lost; we should still merge it, yes? -Eric |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: shutdown xfs_sync_worker before the log, Brian Foster |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: shutdown xfs_sync_worker before the log, Ben Myers |
| Previous by Thread: | Vahvista Identity Webmail, Webmail ylläpitäjä |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests 016: Do not discard blocks at the mkfs time, more verbose version, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |