On Tue 15-05-12 13:12:21, Eric Sandeen wrote:
> On 5/15/12 1:05 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hello,
> > test 274 fails e.g. for ext3 because it does not support fallocate(). So
> > I would think the best way to fix the is to add to the test
> > _require_xfs_io_falloc()
> > so that the test is run only for filesystems which do support fallocate.
> > But with that is connected one slightly related question - why does the
> > test use fallocate(1) binary instead of "xfs_io falloc" command which is
> > more common in xfstests?
> > Honza
> Argh I'm behind. I had:
> [PATCH V2] xfstests: several 274 fixups
> on the list way too long ago.
> Want to test that out? It has 1 review on the list, I'll merge it
> soon - if you want to give it a quick test first, go for it :)
Yup, the patch works for me (since I'm mostly interested in ext3 not
being tested ;). I also reviewed your patch and it looks OK so feel free to
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Just one comment. Messages like:
echo "Fill fs with 1M IOs; EIO expected" >> $seq.full
should probably speak of ENOSPC, not EIO, shouldn't they?
Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
SUSE Labs, CR