[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Test 274 in xfstests

To: Jan Kara <jack@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Test 274 in xfstests
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2012 13:12:21 -0500
Cc: wu.bo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20120515180521.GE26579@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20120515180521.GE26579@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:12.0) Gecko/20120428 Thunderbird/12.0.1
On 5/15/12 1:05 PM, Jan Kara wrote:
>   Hello,
>   test 274 fails e.g. for ext3 because it does not support fallocate(). So
> I would think the best way to fix the is to add to the test
>   _require_xfs_io_falloc()
> so that the test is run only for filesystems which do support fallocate.
> But with that is connected one slightly related question - why does the
> test use fallocate(1) binary instead of "xfs_io falloc" command which is
> more common in xfstests?
>                                                               Honza

Argh I'm behind.  I had:

[PATCH V2] xfstests: several 274 fixups

on the list way too long ago.

Want to test that out?  It has 1 review on the list, I'll merge it
soon - if you want to give it a quick test first, go for it :)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>