xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Strange problems with xfs an SLESS11 SP2

To: "Hammer, Marcus" <Marcus.Hammer@xxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Strange problems with xfs an SLESS11 SP2
From: Stefan Ring <stefanrin@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 18:36:09 +0200
Cc: "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=CVGnupj4M6Nc8ozXM+Q69VMB7nrnaI04iRjuWcVhTfc=; b=dhgA5i4JMTSxsKeHEdIN3AZ1ijWZ+qahrwycnFnF+uUDZJ46WX94ufqKEkaIvp+fPG 05s8yqKlI/X2ZZ2uzWuyC7sFV9aUlkupGH3U6aILUGkrOqHOjkJtbFgxfWoqrjk2WnLb toLt6u9xcwzmsZJI6GZRiSieq8Tcj50pvDg3eSEH66xiGV+eQt+c3c63VBdB+NJNEcRX cjkm/6LZSvlPi3SB9flYkX7Fg8CeYT0VxxjPxXnI7+0v+8Aro9PSeqHwOVJUdg4jM4ak oTbKM9RNicWAlJoQLCobc8fbOERRoU0YDPrQsyBweTCBpQjtDhcpnmB2mVllctvRoX2z Nzfw==
In-reply-to: <CBD2D5A5.7C6B%Marcus.Hammer@xxxxxxxx>
References: <CBD2D5A5.7C6B%Marcus.Hammer@xxxxxxxx>
> The /disk5 is a frequent accessed xfs filesystem by the ERP system. The disk 
> usage increased from 53% to 76-78%. But only the disk usage, the size of the 
> files are completely the same.

Is it possible that this is caused by the aggressive pre-allocation?
There is a mount option (allocsize, I think) that allows you to
override this behavior.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>