xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [PATCH] bio allocation failure due to bio_get_nr_vecs()

from [Bernd Schubert] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bio allocation failure due to bio_get_nr_vecs()
From: Bernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 16:31:25 +0200
Cc: "linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx, Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@xxxxxxxxx>, Tejun Heo <tj@xxxxxxxxxx>, Jens Axboe <axboe@xxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <x49sjf6vml5.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <jognqm$o21$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4FABF01E.7080303@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4FAD18D4.3090102@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <x49sjf6vml5.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120329 Thunderbird/11.0.1 
On 05/11/2012 04:06 PM, Jeff Moyer wrote:

Bernd Schubert<bernd.schubert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>  writes:


diff --git a/fs/bio.c b/fs/bio.c
index e453924..84da885 100644
--- a/fs/bio.c
+++ b/fs/bio.c
@@ -505,9 +505,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(bio_clone);
  int bio_get_nr_vecs(struct block_device *bdev)
  {
        struct request_queue *q = bdev_get_queue(bdev);
-       return min_t(unsigned,
+       int nr_pages;


Looks like a corrupt patch.
What do you actually mean? Issue by thunderbird? I just saved the mail in my sent folder and it looks? Just to be sure, patch attached. 


Thanks,
Bernd

Attachment: fix-bio-nrvec.patch
Description: Text Data

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Blocks deallocation routine when file is deleted, Adil Mujeeb
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH] bio allocation failure due to bio_get_nr_vecs(), Jens Axboe
Previous by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] bio allocation failure due to bio_get_nr_vecs(), Jeff Moyer
Next by Thread:  Re: [PATCH] bio allocation failure due to bio_get_nr_vecs(), Jens Axboe
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]