| To: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: A little RAID experiment |
| From: | Richard Scobie <richard@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Sat, 28 Apr 2012 16:15:09 +1200 |
| Cc: | stefanrin@xxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20120427233047.60eac0c6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4F99CD43.5070306@xxxxxxxxxxx> <20120427233047.60eac0c6@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686 (x86_64); en-US; rv:1.8.1.13) Gecko/20080313 SeaMonkey/1.1.9 |
Emmanuel Florac wrote: Wouldn't it be preferable to use the RAID controller to host the log device? This way you profit from the write cache, as the log easily fits in. This setup is md software RAID ;). The controller is an LSI 1068 using initiator-target firmware. There is no write cache I am aware of. Regards, Richard |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 00/37] xfs: current 3.4 patch queue, Ben Myers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: A little RAID experiment, Stan Hoeppner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: A little RAID experiment, Emmanuel Florac |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 1/2] xfstests README: added 'make install' to building steps, Tom Marek |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |