| To: | Richard Scobie <richard@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: A little RAID experiment |
| From: | Emmanuel Florac <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Apr 2012 23:30:47 +0200 |
| Cc: | stefanrin@xxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4F99CD43.5070306@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Organization: | Intellique |
| References: | <4F99CD43.5070306@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
Le Fri, 27 Apr 2012 10:33:39 +1200 vous écriviez:
> Formatted xfs, with external journal on an independent SATA device,
> mounted delaylog,inode64,logbsize=256k,logdev=/dev/md0,noatime,pquota.
Wouldn't it be preferable to use the RAID controller to host the log
device? This way you profit from the write cache, as the log easily
fits in.
--
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Emmanuel Florac | Direction technique
| Intellique
| <eflorac@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
| +33 1 78 94 84 02
------------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 11.1, Michael Monnerie |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Problem recovering XFS filesystem, Michael Monnerie |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: A little RAID experiment, Richard Scobie |
| Next by Thread: | Re: A little RAID experiment, Richard Scobie |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |