On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 10:29:32AM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 09:58:20AM -0400, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote:
> > Right. Here's the output from a few minutes ago (I removed the empty lines
> > and redundant column headings):
> Thanks, that makes it easy to read ;)
Yeah, I don't know who's brilliant idea it was to output the headings every
> Now comes the "more data needed" bit. I still need the sysrq-w
D'oh! Totally forgot to put that up somewhere.
Sadly, it looks like the kernel's ring buffer wrapped while dumping the ~180
> but also given the length of the incident, some other data
> is definitely needed:
> - a 30s event trace - it'll compress pretty well
> (trace-cmd record -e xfs* sleep 30; trace-cmd report > output.txt)
Hrm... Time to figure out how to get ftrace going on Gentoo. I don't see an
obvious package to install to get trace-cmd.
> - vmstat 1 output for the same period
> - output of /proc/meminfo at the same time
> - the same iostat output for comparison.
I'm somewhere between geek and normal.
- Linus Torvalds