xfs
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: xfs_check segfault / xfs_repair I/O error

from [Eric Sandeen] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: Drew Wareham <m3rlin@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs_check segfault / xfs_repair I/O error
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:01:36 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CALcU-6i3MY+Z-dFzE5p34DSMxcQi2dPdXZHenh+=5TObyiB8eQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CALcU-6goaENFYsvUxz3yQD=w6ipmHuo-GxoRHT1GaQ6+yW5-pA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F917B77.6040403@xxxxxxxxxxx> <CALcU-6i3MY+Z-dFzE5p34DSMxcQi2dPdXZHenh+=5TObyiB8eQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120327 Thunderbird/11.0.1 
On 4/20/12 10:46 AM, Drew Wareham wrote:
> Good point!  We're running CentOS 5, so is the CentOS-Plus repo the way to 
> go?  These servers are all setup from a fairly old base image hence using 
> kmod-xfs, definitely something I'll address.

as long as you're on x86_64, the stock kernel has the xfs.ko you want.

I'm not big on offering too much centos support, but i would rather not see 
people using reaaaly crufty xfs.  :)

-Eric
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: xfs_check segfault / xfs_repair I/O error, Drew Wareham
Next by Date:  Re: [PATCH 09/10] xfs: on-stack delayed write buffer lists, Mark Tinguely
Previous by Thread:  Re: xfs_check segfault / xfs_repair I/O error, Drew Wareham
Next by Thread:  Re: xfs_check segfault / xfs_repair I/O error, Drew Wareham
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]