On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 02:12:58PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 04:29:11PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:10:43PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > Here's a repost of my current patch queue. They are all based on
> > > Christoph's
> > > ilock and xfsbufd patch series and been tested on top of them. I've
> > > updated all
> > > the reviewed-by tags, so if the patch is missing such a tag then it
> > > hasn't been
> > > reviewed....
> > Looks like Christoph has some work to do on patch 4 of his xfsbufd series.
> > Do
> > you want to rebase to something without that patch?
> It's a bit of a PITA to do because of all the overlap with
> Christoph's patch set.
I noticed. ;)
> I'll spend the afternoon trying to work out
> what is wrong with Christoph's code, because I think we really need
> to get rid of the xfsbufd before I start making the buffer code more
> complex again...
Cool. I agree it's great to get rid of xfsbufd, just wanted you to know that
the hang is blocking this series.