xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/18] xfs: current patch queue

To: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/18] xfs: current patch queue
From: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2012 09:44:44 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20120417041258.GF6734@dastard>
References: <1334319061-12968-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120416212911.GE2924@xxxxxxx> <20120417041258.GF6734@dastard>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Hey Dave,

On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 02:12:58PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 04:29:11PM -0500, Ben Myers wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 10:10:43PM +1000, Dave Chinner wrote:
> > > Here's a repost of my current patch queue. They are all based on 
> > > Christoph's
> > > ilock and xfsbufd patch series and been tested on top of them. I've 
> > > updated all
> > > the reviewed-by tags, so if the patch is missing such a tag then it 
> > > hasn't been
> > > reviewed....
> > 
> > Looks like Christoph has some work to do on patch 4 of his xfsbufd series.  
> > Do
> > you want to rebase to something without that patch?
> 
> It's a bit of a PITA to do because of all the overlap with
> Christoph's patch set.

I noticed.  ;)

> I'll spend the afternoon trying to work out
> what is wrong with Christoph's code, because I think we really need
> to get rid of the xfsbufd before I start making the buffer code more
> complex again...

Cool.  I agree it's great to get rid of xfsbufd, just wanted you to know that
the hang is blocking this series.

Regards,
        Ben

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>