xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: RAID5 created by 8 disks works with xfs

To: Jack Wang <jack.wang.usish@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: RAID5 created by 8 disks works with xfs
From: daobang wang <wangdb1981@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2012 14:45:44 +0800
Cc: stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Marcus Sorensen <shadowsor@xxxxxxxxx>, Mathias Burén <mathias.buren@xxxxxxxxx>, linux-raid <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=bXT6uM9yhTW4PCDalGYXZLXspYjrKKjklsaM+h8vzcQ=; b=kMBeMN3ZKDazc/DLnJUMQxydyer9BT2vt0KDjtPP94S9CnZ7dRaQol+KXYX9B6VZjq 9PB2RtZrhr0zHT9n0983VgUAQzwD2JvMF9tJYE4dbXDTocV4BGnSV/nSYr62yz7VAGr4 zx5m4sLUy743XYtR8Zl1L8NI6mbvD+ZTJoWGSdD6x/2hhktfPCINpipaFnS6DCiq8Q+O k8trpJDFn44zjd6+JcyH4NpTSh59f7s0XDLLcTUU7uNwtpgaHS4tkUtGQSrQKYsjnxCC 3GIfNWvzxiWilatKdHxLkcUX/AsGHm/VovfgcnogHdfjT709nSsBRecRINN/pau3JQl+ vtTQ==
In-reply-to: <CA+res+RR5iAZsEY8G21YkQn+p_8EYSFvu4+H1SK=HXshOcS-4g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CACwgYDPQBNa7z7WcyUjV2Rx8Qf47r7eaRCowNKxjLBz+fYcfvQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CADNH=7H_rgiY4fkB0SHo0yPhSBib7Gq-E_fu18yuJx=enn-eGg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F776492.4070600@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CACwgYDOSrEYUps2VLpFSZ-irH7Mn_-BWrOYYDgXS=ULrmVuEPw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F77D0B2.8000809@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CACwgYDMx6nQF-OwYj-BA+sZivUK=kmv2tPukgf5JGwA1vMTGrA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F77EA55.6090004@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CACwgYDMVHT5DFjJztX9JvsVQJ+uOjPrfcs4+0aGXotDvf6tymQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CACwgYDMXF9WEgzW9vL_0=GdRc_t+67WAkRTKNoKOMEMCvjujVw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CALFpzo5aKM2y_stDR14PNYMHEcq5CEptuFiXrvcCpXTzSQmAxw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F792154.5020006@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CACwgYDPsZSEhuqNP8YgAksEq9BB6YOS1Q8jGx2J7DCrrOh_JQw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CACwgYDOtCoVF-p+KKqPYxHhA4vWF78Ueecx9hcVWLoyxFWzV9Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F7E0842.6090004@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CACwgYDMEpFqJhtUGeRg4hvux3GigNRnA--V18DwdyUvJpY434w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CACwgYDPur_8sO-BhhP-ggEmPCGa5ddsCcmSDfCuhD9OgiwGRyw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CA+res+RR5iAZsEY8G21YkQn+p_8EYSFvu4+H1SK=HXshOcS-4g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Jacky,

     Yes, the environment is like your description, i will try with
your suggestion. thanks a lot.

On 4/6/12, Jack Wang <jack.wang.usish@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> using bigger inode size or inode64 does help?
>
> So your environment is NVR software running in Linux ,100+ D1 streamer
> directly write to filesystem on top of 16 SATA disks (with raid5 and
> vg)?
>
> 2012/4/6 daobang wang <wangdb1981@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> There is another issue, i updated xfsprog from 2.10.1 to 3.1.5, and
>> found i could not make the xfs filesystem when the logical volume size
>> large than 8TB with command mkfs.xfs -f -i size=512
>> /dev/vg+vg00+20120406101850/lv+nxx+lv0000, this command seems hang, it
>> did not return for a long time, is there any parameter i should
>> adjust?
>>
>> Thank you very much
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Daobang Wang.
>>
>> On 4/6/12, daobang wang <wangdb1981@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>>     I have found the solution, i updated the xfsprogs from 2.10.1 to
>>> 3.1.5, and could repair it, Thanks.
>>>
>>> Best Wishes,
>>> Daobang Wang.
>>>
>>> On 4/6/12, Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> On 4/5/2012 1:48 AM, daobang wang wrote:
>>>>> Hi stan,
>>>>>
>>>>>      I duplicated the input/output error issue, about the detail
>>>>> operations and logs, please see the attachments, Is there any way to
>>>>> fix this? thanks!
>>>>>
>>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>> Daobang Wang.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> These fiilesystem issues have nothing to do with linux-raid.  I'm
>>>> copying the XFS mailing list which is where this discussion should be
>>>> taking place from this point forward.  Please reply-to-all, and paste
>>>> the output you previously attached, but inline this time.
>>>>
>>>> Also, since the XFS folks are unfamiliar with what you're doing up to
>>>> this point, please provide a basic description of your hardware/storage
>>>> setup, kernel version, mdraid configuration, xfs_info output as well as
>>>> your fstab XFS mount options, and a description of your workload.
>>>>
>>>> My best guess at this point as to the du and ls errors is that your
>>>> application is not behaving properly, or you're still running with XFS
>>>> barriers disabled, which, I say _loudly_ for the 2nd time, you should
>>>> NOT do in the absence of BBWC, which you stated you do not have.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Stan
>>>>
>>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-raid" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>