| To: | Linux fs XFS <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS: Abysmal write performance because of excessive seeking (allocation groups to blame?) |
| From: | pg_xf2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Peter Grandi) |
| Date: | Fri, 6 Apr 2012 02:09:47 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <20120405213740.GA22824@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <CAAxjCEwBMbd0x7WQmFELM8JyFu6Kv_b+KDe3XFqJE6shfSAfyQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120405213740.GA22824@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
[ ... ] > For metadata intensive workloads like yours you would be much > better using a non-striping raid, e.g. concatentation and > mirroring instead of raid 5 or raid 6. I know this has a cost > in terms of "wasted" space, but for IOPs bound workload the > difference is dramatic. The problem with parity RAIDs and small-write-IO intensive workloads is not striping as such, it is with *large* stripes. That is a detail that matters quite a lot. |
| Previous by Date: | Re: repeated abuses of the XFS list, Russell Cattelan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: repeated abuses of the XFS list, Russell Cattelan |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS: Abysmal write performance because of excessive seeking (allocation groups to blame?), Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS: Abysmal write performance because of excessive seeking (allocation groups to blame?), Stefan Ring |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |