| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: Do background CIL flushes via a workqueue |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 29 Mar 2012 19:52:26 +1100 |
| Cc: | Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20120327170309.GA6712@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1332841605-3538-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120327143127.GA11434@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120327155759.GB28707@xxxxxxxxxx> <20120327160300.GA22555@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120327161941.GC28707@xxxxxxxxxx> <20120327170309.GA6712@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 01:03:09PM -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:19:41PM -0400, Vivek Goyal wrote: > > So xfs either need to resort to similar optimizaiton where IO type from > > both the process context is of same type or try to do all the IO from > > one process context. > > All XFS log I/O is marked SYNC and (FUA and/or FLUSH). Not if the filesystem is mounted nobarrier, as is recommended for filesystems on hardware RAID with BBWCs.... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: Do background CIL flushes via a workqueue, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | xfstests: 066: why stat dir but not largefile?, Liu Yu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: Do background CIL flushes via a workqueue, Vivek Goyal |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfs: Do background CIL flushes via a workqueue, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |