| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: raid10n2/xfs setup guidance on write-cache/barrier |
| From: | Martin Steigerwald <Martin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 26 Mar 2012 21:50:09 +0200 |
| In-reply-to: | <20324.44842.473837.511238@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <CAA8mOyDKrWg0QUEHxcD4ocXXD42nJu0TG+sXjC4j2RsigHTcmw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAA8mOyC-xCcNxQFz-M1_TfnxcGBmpUdQ57_vYNVF11jhWK3SSA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20324.44842.473837.511238@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (sfid-20120317_170615_344209_38609A88) |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.2.0-2-amd64; KDE/4.7.4; x86_64; ; ) |
Am Samstag, 17. März 2012 schrieb Peter Grandi: > > I'd like to read about the NFS blog entry but the link you > > included results in a 404. I forgot to mention in my last > > reply. > > Oops I forgot a bit of the URL: > http://www.sabi.co.uk/blog/0707jul.html#070701b > > Note that currently I suggest different values from: > > «vm/dirty_ratio =4 > vm/dirty_background_ratio =2» Consider dirty_background_bytes as thats indepentend of the amount of installed memory. Ciao, -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7 |
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] xfstests 235: do smaller test IO, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 1/5] xfs: avoid taking the ilock unnessecarily in xfs_qm_dqattach, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: raid10n2/xfs setup guidance on write-cache/barrier (GiB alignment), Peter Grandi |
| Next by Thread: | NOW:Peter goading Dave over delaylog - WAS: Re: raid10n2/xfs setup guidance on write-cache/barrier, Stan Hoeppner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |