| To: | Peter Grandi <pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: raid10n2/xfs setup guidance on write-cache/barrier |
| From: | Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 19 Mar 2012 04:07:25 -0500 |
| Cc: | Linux RAID <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux fs XFS <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <20326.13500.799169.828158@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <CAA8mOyDKrWg0QUEHxcD4ocXXD42nJu0TG+sXjC4j2RsigHTcmw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F61803A.60009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAA8mOyCzs36YD_QUMq25HQf8zuq1=tmSTPjYdoFJwy2Oq9sLmw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20321.63389.586851.689070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F64115D.50208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120317223454.GQ5091@dastard> <20325.17387.216150.45013@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20325.50714.237894.328039@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120318140051.GA2594@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20326.13500.799169.828158@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Reply-to: | stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2 |
On 3/18/2012 2:17 PM, Peter Grandi wrote: > It is noticeable that 90% of your post is pure malicious > offtopic personal attack, and the rest is "from on high", > and the whole is entirely devoid of technical content. It is noticeable that 100% of my post was technical content, directly asked questions of you, yet you chose to respond to Christoph's "personal attacks" while avoiding answering my purely technical questions. I guess we can assume your silence, your unwillingness to answer my questions, is a sign of capitulation. -- Stan |
| Previous by Date: | Download the attachment and get back to me, Susan Shabangu |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | ftruncate() Writes Last Block of File, Alan Cook |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: raid10n2/xfs setup guidance on write-cache/barrier, Peter Grandi |
| Next by Thread: | Re: raid10n2/xfs setup guidance on write-cache/barrier, Jessie Evangelista |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |