xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: raid10n2/xfs setup guidance on write-cache/barrier

To: Peter Grandi <pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: raid10n2/xfs setup guidance on write-cache/barrier
From: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 04:07:25 -0500
Cc: Linux RAID <linux-raid@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux fs XFS <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20326.13500.799169.828158@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CAA8mOyDKrWg0QUEHxcD4ocXXD42nJu0TG+sXjC4j2RsigHTcmw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F61803A.60009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAA8mOyCzs36YD_QUMq25HQf8zuq1=tmSTPjYdoFJwy2Oq9sLmw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20321.63389.586851.689070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F64115D.50208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120317223454.GQ5091@dastard> <20325.17387.216150.45013@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20325.50714.237894.328039@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120318140051.GA2594@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20326.13500.799169.828158@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:10.0.2) Gecko/20120216 Thunderbird/10.0.2
On 3/18/2012 2:17 PM, Peter Grandi wrote:

> It is noticeable that 90% of your post is pure malicious
> offtopic personal attack, and the rest is "from on high",
> and the whole is entirely devoid of technical content.

It is noticeable that 100% of my post was technical content, directly
asked questions of you, yet you chose to respond to Christoph's
"personal attacks" while avoiding answering my purely technical questions.

I guess we can assume your silence, your unwillingness to answer my
questions, is a sign of capitulation.

-- 
Stan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>