xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: NOW:Peter goading Dave over delaylog - WAS: Re: raid10n2/xfs setup

To: Stan Hoeppner <stan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: NOW:Peter goading Dave over delaylog - WAS: Re: raid10n2/xfs setup guidance on write-cache/barrier
From: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 18 Mar 2012 09:34:54 +1100
Cc: Peter Grandi <pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Linux fs XFS <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4F64115D.50208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CAA8mOyDKrWg0QUEHxcD4ocXXD42nJu0TG+sXjC4j2RsigHTcmw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F61803A.60009@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAA8mOyCzs36YD_QUMq25HQf8zuq1=tmSTPjYdoFJwy2Oq9sLmw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20321.63389.586851.689070@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F64115D.50208@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 11:21:49PM -0500, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
> I'm guessing either Dave chose not to take your bait, or simply didn't
> read your message.  If the former this thread will likely die now.  If
> the latter, and Dave decides to respond, I'm grabbing some popcorn, a
> beer, and a lawn chair. ;)

Just ignore the troll, Stan.  I've got code to write and bugs to fix
- I don't have time to waste on irrelevant semantic arguments about
the definition of "performance optimisation" for improvements that
are done, dusted and widely deployed.

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>