On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 10:32:34AM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 10:26:44AM -0500, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
> > This is an automated email from the git hooks/post-receive script. It was
> > generated because a ref change was pushed to the repository containing
> > the project "XFS development tree".
> >
> > The branch, master has been updated
> > a05931c xfs: remove the global xfs_Gqm structure
> > b84a3a9 xfs: remove the per-filesystem list of dquots
> > 9f920f1 xfs: use per-filesystem radix trees for dquot lookup
> > f8739c3 xfs: per-filesystem dquot LRU lists
> > 48776fd xfs: use common code for quota statistics
> > from 8f639ddea0c4978ae9b4e46ea041c9e5afe0ee8d (commit)
>
> These updates have caused significant conflicts against the current
> mainline tree:
>
> $ git merge xfs-oss/master
> Auto-merging fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in fs/xfs/xfs_trans_dquot.c
> Auto-merging fs/xfs/xfs_trans.c
> Auto-merging fs/xfs/xfs_trace.h
> Auto-merging fs/xfs/xfs_qm_syscalls.c
> Removing fs/xfs/xfs_qm_stats.h
> CONFLICT (modify/delete): fs/xfs/xfs_qm_stats.c deleted in xfs-oss/master and
> modified in HEAD. Version HEAD of fs/xfs/xfs_qm_stats.c left in tree.
> Auto-merging fs/xfs/xfs_qm.h
> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in fs/xfs/xfs_qm.h
> Auto-merging fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c
> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in fs/xfs/xfs_qm.c
> Auto-merging fs/xfs/xfs_log_recover.c
> Auto-merging fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c
> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in fs/xfs/xfs_dquot.c
> Auto-merging fs/quota/quota.c
> Automatic merge failed; fix conflicts and then commit the result.
> $
>
> The conflict is quite extensive, and appears to be caused by the two
> quota commits in the mainline commit that are also in the master
> branch not being resolved properly....
>
> Anyone else seeing this when trying to merge the xfs master branch
> into a mainline tree?
Hrm...
I've found that if you merge
d0a3fe67e30261bb2018d2a06f33ff3303438c8e
then
33e0edafd78d83273c14b14501cff063fac528e5
then
oss/master
it works fine.
I wonder if there is a better way to resolve it.
-Ben
|