| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 05/10] xfs: introduce an allocation workqueue |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:16:26 -0400 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <1331095828-28742-6-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1331095828-28742-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1331095828-28742-6-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
While I still heavily dislike the idea I can't see how else we can work around the stack abuse in common code: Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 3.2.9 and locking problem, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 3.2.9 and locking problem, Richard Ems |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 05/10] xfs: introduce an allocation workqueue, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 05/10] xfs: introduce an allocation workqueue, Mark Tinguely |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |