xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Safe to use XFS in production in Linux 3.2.9?

To: Sean Thomas Caron <scaron@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Safe to use XFS in production in Linux 3.2.9?
From: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 10:45:33 -0600
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, hch@xxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20120309110838.147865q6j5c9hqsc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20120308140600.77406b8zzy2zggkc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120308235326.GQ5091@dastard> <20120309110838.147865q6j5c9hqsc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Sean,

On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 11:08:38AM -0500, Sean Thomas Caron wrote:
> OK, Linux 3.2.9 doesn't sound very safe to use in production. So, fine, 
> we can try 3.0.23; it appears that a fix for CVE-2012-0056 was applied 
> around 3.0.19 so it should be all set in that regard.
>
> I'm comparing the contents of the xfs-bulletproof-sync patch with the  
> 3.0.23 XFS sources and it's not entirely clear to me if 3.0.23 fully  
> implements the fixes in the patch. Please forgive me because it's a  
> little long, but here's the contents of the patch:

Looks like this fix made 3.0.16:

# git describe 6826d3e80d143ca7411fd2dca05bc57c7ed3e620
v3.0.15-68-g6826d3e

-Ben

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>