| To: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH V3] xfstests 279: test mkfs with various sector sizes & alignments |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 9 Mar 2012 10:11:58 +1100 |
| Cc: | Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <4F5931BF.8010503@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4F5005D1.6040208@xxxxxxxxxx> <4F50479B.2050609@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4F50FC24.3060908@xxxxxxxxxxx> <4F5931BF.8010503@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Mar 08, 2012 at 04:25:03PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 3/2/12 10:58 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > This test uses the scsi_debug module to test mkfs against > > various physical & logical sector sizes, and with aligned > > and unaligned devices. > > > > Signed-off-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Dave, I think this implements all your suggestions (in one way or > > another...) except the non-modular scsi_debug. I don't know > > how to manipulate things like offset if it's built in, but > > if you want to look... I don't see it. > > > > V3: remove a couple stray/extra "tee" commands > > > > I looked into doing a generic version of this but I think without > > the sector size checking unique to xfs it's a little pointless. > > Dave, think this is ok now? Yup. Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> -- Dave Chinner david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [patch 1/1] xfstests: update inode softlimit output in 050, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 11/19] xfs: Convert to new freezing code, Dave Chinner |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH V3] xfstests 279: test mkfs with various sector sizes & alignments, Eric Sandeen |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH] xfsprogs: pick up 4k physical sector size, Eric Sandeen |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |