| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 7/8] xfs: split in-core and on-disk inode log item fields |
| From: | Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Thu, 8 Mar 2012 12:40:09 -0600 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20120229095509.376594756@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20120229095347.009884687@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120229095509.376594756@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 04:53:54AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Add a new ili_fields member to the inode log item to isolate the in-memory > flags from the ones that actually go to the log. This will allow tracking > timestamp-only updates for fdatasync and O_DSYNC in the next patch and > prepares for divorcing the on-disk log format from the in-memory log item > a little further down the road. > > Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx> You were careful to update ilf_fields in xfs_inode_item_format... Looks good. Reviewed-by: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] default to 64 bit inodes & add feature flag, Ben Myers |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Safe to use XFS in production in Linux 3.2.9?, Sean Thomas Caron |
| Previous by Thread: | RZM PROFILE(looking for a moulds manufacturer and molding service provider?), John Gao |
| Next by Thread: | Safe to use XFS in production in Linux 3.2.9?, Sean Thomas Caron |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |