| To: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] default to 64 bit inodes & add feature flag |
| From: | Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz <arekm@xxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 7 Mar 2012 19:07:53 +0100 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=maven.pl; s=maven; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:message-id; bh=deDKvA6kB3yIxNs+igDvPsNtpXaLoAYIbLwD5CCCWcs=; b=S2sz1zPLweve20PAqxxG6CSvIpt4JWxv9QmnwE5AvSJIxMpsavPHf/EiH8Gzma+cy7 RI/QvWS/qcvstnpdATkuidJq/uzkDWXsdfiY7CW/vHssEHRfO4I6dlbF1NhhRZnTEeeX F58gWVzX6OzsNfxjH+QVLj4a6qAGhmjSzY1kM= |
| In-reply-to: | <20120307173313.GA20399@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4F5798F9.2050809@xxxxxxxxxx> <20120307173313.GA20399@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.13.7 (Linux/3.3.0-rc5-00166-g1f033c1; KDE/4.8.1; x86_64; ; ) |
On Wednesday 07 of March 2012, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 11:20:57AM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote: > > From: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Default to allowing 64-bit inodes on the filesystem. > > > > Add a feature bit to the the superblock to record whether 64 bit inodes > > have been allocated on the filesystem or not. This allows us to reject > > mounting the filesytem with inode32 if 64 bit inodes are present. > > > > Once a 64 bitinode is allocated, the inode64 superblock feature bit will > > be set. Once the superblock feature bit is set, the filesystem will > > default to 64 bit inodes regardless of whether inode64 is specified as a > > mount option. > > > > To ensure only 32 bit inodes are created, the inode32 mount option must > > be used. If there are already 64 bit inodes as flagged by the superblock > > feature bit, then the inode32 mount will be refused. > > > > Signed-off-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Love it! +1 for love. I had too many problems with forgetting to mount with inode64 option. -- Arkadiusz Miśkiewicz PLD/Linux Team arekm / maven.pl http://ftp.pld-linux.org/ |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: df bigger than ls?, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 6/8] xfs: make xfs_inode_item_size idempotent, Ben Myers |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] default to 64 bit inodes & add feature flag, Josef 'Jeff' Sipek |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] default to 64 bit inodes & add feature flag, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |