[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [XFS] xfs_repair time how long it takes??

To: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [XFS] xfs_repair time how long it takes??
From: Ryan Lee <ryanlee.lahk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 3 Mar 2012 00:56:23 +0900
Authentication-results: mk-inboundfilter-3-a-1.b2b.uk.tiscali.com; dkim=pass (signature verified) header.i=@xxxxxxxxx
Cc: Brian Candler <B.Candler@xxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: B.Candler@xxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=resent-from :resent-date:resent-message-id:resent-to:mime-version :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc :content-type; s=sasl; bh=GcsbmJRytjR8APFR05SzfAcM4UQ=; b=kj+AbU atPtdlhWpQofzkXHrj06CNQtCkEXlTCVWXkAw0zOJXo6Hz+q/q4ahrjK002A7GT0 K7mC9/onG1BlfGOUJLkiUNje15YTWlDrN2oqEifBSGKKbwptTSBteBq9JriovSeY 3G2Y/F1mxfZc7dnRZSqinK5RkKbCWD1H/TYDA=
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=9INqM3BfLltOdaEZl2sDSTlUTPClPjVetwEC2OtLTXY=; b=JYEY223GsxzSWh3Rf36DXs2zDL74AQmvMoOy+2ss24gSbvgSM9dfp7u1o/AMjxl+X6 SCRq47E2m7YoIS6npK595dZNiOs6XPEzEZsenjneJ37ytsHlFouOZqoFjwXlowWGr9S0 4pfQlMLHGcmP5Ic7dE6Wwvlh61yBUWnq+JVLIT/zLP1ROUAQq4tvyNilCO12RSIthzLO XmBrwOOMRc5Yr6K4ZyzfPZajXvzJ7qWGQlMl9lpgrxbRyCt0ipaZFwI+VIMnP3/ychBQ VMH58hRWGYOa1VvOrIQSIe0qQuDRCnunHwm+sw9jJOClKlaP+iTSRpCDvLsB74hUH7OT 2azw==
In-reply-to: <CABF-5Wo1BRGgiy89PO+6sXzZ5ggFJYAXtXu+DA9hbEvfazFNqw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CABF-5WptGU3vmScFcpHVstd2UZfCAqiY4dGvL=_1+feFvYuS6g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120302140145.GA11911@xxxxxxxx> <37B5727D-1E3B-4A96-BF7F-4CA6DAF9B63C@xxxxxxxxx> <4F50E246.4020502@xxxxxxxxxxx> <CABF-5Wo1BRGgiy89PO+6sXzZ5ggFJYAXtXu+DA9hbEvfazFNqw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-date: Fri, 2 Mar 2012 16:16:16 +0000
Resent-from: Brian Candler <brian@xxxxxxxx>
Resent-message-id: <20120302161616.GC12352@xxxxxxxx>
Resent-to: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
I have one more qustion for  you.
You told me like this "then I would suspect a misconfiguration (maybe mounting -o nobarrier with write caches enabled on the drives?) "
How can I check this misconfiguration? such as "-o nobarrier" is I couldn't find this option with mount in my busybox and what do you mean the sentence this " write caches enabled on the drives?"

On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 12:48 AM, Ryan Lee <ryanlee.lahk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi, all.
Thanks a lot of your kindness for me.
I really realy appreciate it.
I am going to tell you what I have done so far porting  XFS in our system.
First of all, the resources of our system.
KERNEL : 2.6.37-2.6
XFSPROGS : 3.1.7
Second, I did this step.
1. mounting an xfs filesystem after an unclean shutdown on a machine.
As a result i saw this error below.
XFS: xlog_recover_process_data: bad clientid
XFS: log mount/recovery failed: error 5
XFS: log mount failed
2. I patched for this error 1 from internet.
I did aging test by my self.
As a result, after one day overnight, the XFS Filesystem crashed.
3, I look for another solution for 1 problem. eventually I found using xfs_repair to remove dirty log and recover.
But as i mentioned it, it takes time a lot.
You guys told me to use  the "fsck.xfs". but i think it couldn't solve the problem 1 above.
Onething more, I already know about the problem with "xfs_repair", but I cound't find any other good solution to fix it until now.
How can I fix it?
Please help me.
Thanks, Ryan.

On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 3/2/12 8:26 AM, Ryan wrote:
> How about the dirty log. I use the xfs_repair because the dirty log must be removed when i mount HDD.
> As you know xfs filesystem doen't repair the dirty log so i couldn't mount the HDD after when i do cold reset during writing the HDD. How i can solve this problem?

If mount fails to replay the dirty log after a power loss, then I would suspect a misconfiguration (maybe mounting -o nobarrier with write caches enabled on the drives?) or a bug in your version of xfs, possibly unique to architecture (what architecture is it, what kernel is it, what xfs "porting" did you do?)


> Sent from my iPhone.
> On Mar 2, 2012, at 11:01 PM, Brian Candler <B.Candler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 02, 2012 at 10:09:56PM +0900, Ryan Lee wrote:
>>>   The problem is the taking time with xfs_repair like this "]# xfs_repair
>>>   -P -L /dev/sda2" is to long to wait in our embedded system and for me,
>>>   so the booing time is increasing around 2 minutes totally.
>> Why do you feel you need to run xfs_repair on every boot? Regular Linux
>> systems do not attempt this, the same as they don't force a full "e2fsck -f"
>> on every boot.
>> http://linux.die.net/man/8/fsck.xfs
> _______________________________________________
> xfs mailing list
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
> http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>