xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Bug#661580: mkfs.xfs fails to detect correct sector size

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Bug#661580: mkfs.xfs fails to detect correct sector size
From: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 10:28:50 -0300
Cc: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@xxxxxx>, 661580@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivered-to: submit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20120228091151.GA24717@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20120228074914.31280.78231.reportbug@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120228091151.GA24717@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>, 661580@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Resent-cc: XFS Development Team <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 13:33:02 +0000
Resent-from: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-message-id: <handler.661580.B.13304357449730@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-sender: Debian BTS <debbugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Resent-to: debian-bugs-dist@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 04:11:51AM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Carlos, didn't you plan to look into this issue?
> 
> Goswin, how do you determin that mkfs is still doing unaligned I/O
> when forcing the large sevtor size?  Once we set the sector size XFS
> can't do I/O smaller than it.
> 
> On Tue, Feb 28, 2012 at 08:49:14AM +0100, Goswin von Brederlow wrote:

Yes, I was looking to it some time ago, but iirc it was already implemented and
I was just fixins some issues on the code already implemented. I just got a new
box and I'm recovering my backup (including code trees). I'll take a look on
this later today and let you know on which steps this is.

-- 
--Carlos


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>