xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS status update for January 2012

To: Richard Ems <richard.ems@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS status update for January 2012
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:33:08 -0500
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <4F4B7CB1.50102@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20120225120216.GA21721@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F4B5CB3.8090107@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F4B7408.8020706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F4B7CB1.50102@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 01:53:05PM +0100, Richard Ems wrote:
> On 02/27/2012 01:16 PM, Coert Waagmeester wrote:
> 
> > Hello Richard,
> > 
> > Here I am running gentoo with kernel 3.2
> > In the 2.6 era I always mounted my xfs file systems with the delaylog
> > option, is this still necessary? Is delaylog now default?
> 
> Hi Coert,
> 
> I am running now 3.2.7 and the output of " grep xfs /proc/mounts " shows
> delaylog as being in use. I didn't put this option in /etc/fstab, so I
> think it must be default now.
> 
> But surely a developer can give a much better answer to your question.

Delaylog has been the default since Linux 2.6.39.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>