| To: | Richard Ems <richard.ems@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS status update for January 2012 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 28 Feb 2012 03:33:08 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4F4B7CB1.50102@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20120225120216.GA21721@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F4B5CB3.8090107@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F4B7408.8020706@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F4B7CB1.50102@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 01:53:05PM +0100, Richard Ems wrote: > On 02/27/2012 01:16 PM, Coert Waagmeester wrote: > > > Hello Richard, > > > > Here I am running gentoo with kernel 3.2 > > In the 2.6 era I always mounted my xfs file systems with the delaylog > > option, is this still necessary? Is delaylog now default? > > Hi Coert, > > I am running now 3.2.7 and the output of " grep xfs /proc/mounts " shows > delaylog as being in use. I didn't put this option in /etc/fstab, so I > think it must be default now. > > But surely a developer can give a much better answer to your question. Delaylog has been the default since Linux 2.6.39. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Bug#661580: mkfs.xfs fails to detect correct sector size, Goswin von Brederlow |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Warning from unlock_new_inode, Christoph Hellwig |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS status update for January 2012, Richard Ems |
| Next by Thread: | mount: Structure needs cleaning, MikeJeezy |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |