| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 8/8] xfs: add back fdatasync support |
| From: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 21 Feb 2012 16:23:01 +1100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20120221003907.518904261@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <20120221003824.415885674@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120221003907.518904261@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 07:38:32PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Add an in-memory only flag to say we logged timestamps only, and use it to
> check if fdatasync can optimize away the log force.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Looks good. Couple of minor things below.
Reviewed-by: Dave Chinner <dchinner@xxxxxxxxxx>
> +/*
> + * The timestamps in the core are dirty, but not nessecarily anything
necessarily
> + * else.
> + *
> + * This is an incore only value store in ilf_fields & co, which must
> + * never make it to disk, unlike the other fields above.
That comment is a bit incoherent. Perhaps:
* this is an incore-only flag stored in ili_fields which, unlike
* the above flags, must never make it to disk in the ilf_fields.
Cheers,
Dave.
--
Dave Chinner
david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 7/8] xfs: split in-core and on-disk inode log item fields, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | XFS, empty files after a crash, kfx |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 8/8] xfs: add back fdatasync support, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 6/8] xfs: make xfs_inode_item_size idempotent, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |