[Top] [All Lists]

Transactional XFS?

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Transactional XFS?
From: Grozdan <neutrino8@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:15:46 +0100
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=hd1fEHdEjoqfAygVdf0wDdVpwttr9XuxArQ1ulWtw0o=; b=LsURvxXINRLH21QDE1bT3rX9RPOmriu8mqPMgXvYmAVsb1Dre3///xE0zfNqsFUVYy scuQCKdnRL9kaISrJFV7sFWX2icpS34wkQeg5qVoNK4OLqUTUwv9wafQytgEaMpooQA2 6p6EX/tCEcI5v9BPfybibeuj1gA6rRYNyYUYM=

I just finished watching the excellent speech of Dave Chinner at
linux.conf.au and I must say I'm impressed by the recent improvements
to XFS. Towards the end of the talk, Dave talked about upcoming
improvements on Metadata reliability and other features. What I'm
wondering about is if there are any plans in making XFS transactional
(fully atomic) like it is the case with recent NTFS versions on
Windows Vista and higher?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>