| To: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: XFS unlink still slow on 3.1.9 kernel ? |
| From: | Richard Ems <richard.ems@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 13 Feb 2012 19:18:47 +0100 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20120213181012.GA27962@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4F394116.8080200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120213170825.GA7197@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F394442.9020307@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120213171556.GA13449@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F3947D6.5060402@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120213172937.GA25248@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F394E10.9000804@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120213180220.GA24163@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F395134.8030202@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120213181012.GA27962@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:10.0.1) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0.1 |
On 02/13/2012 07:10 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 07:06:44PM +0100, Richard Ems wrote: >> So >> >> 1. use kernels > 3.2, if XFS partition was not created using "-i size=1024" > > Yes. > >> 2. if XFS partition was created using "-i size=1024", kernels < 3.2 will >> also be fast while unlinking files with out of line attributes > > Exactly. > > For workloads like yours creating the large inodes (probably only with > 512 byte inodes, though) will be preferably if you have a choice, as it > should be even faster. Ok, I see. I will do it on all new XFS partitions, since we heavily use ACLs. Many thanks, Richard -- Richard Ems mail: Richard.Ems@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Cape Horn Engineering S.L. C/ Dr. J.J. Dómine 1, 5º piso 46011 Valencia Tel : +34 96 3242923 / Fax 924 http://www.cape-horn-eng.com |
| Previous by Date: | Re: quotacheck speed, Arkadiusz MiÅkiewicz |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 2/3] ext4: honor the O_SYNC flag for aysnchronous direct I/O requests, Jan Kara |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: XFS unlink still slow on 3.1.9 kernel ?, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: XFS unlink still slow on 3.1.9 kernel ?, Richard Ems |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |