On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 06:11:30PM +0100, Richard Ems wrote:
> On 02/13/2012 06:08 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 05:57:58PM +0100, Richard Ems wrote:
> >> This is a backup system running dirvish, so most files in the dirs I am
> >> removing are hard links. Almost all of the files do have ACLs set.
> >
> > How many ACLs do you usually have set? If they aren't stored inline
> > but need to go out of the inode unlinks will be extremly slow for
> > kernels before v3.2.
> >
>
> Almost all dirs and files there do have ACLs set.
> Each of them do have about 10 user ACLs and 10 default ACls.
> Is that too many?
> Is this then the reason for being that slow?
That doesn't sound like a lot to me, but instead of guessing around,
let's just check the actual facts.
Does "xfs_bmap -a" for the kind of files you are deleting show any
extents? If it doesn't the output will look like:
# xfs_bmap -a internal
internal: no extents
if it has any it will look like:
# xfs_bmap -a external
external:
0: [0..7]: 8557712..8557719
|