[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Red Hat bug 643571

To: <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: Red Hat bug 643571
From: <shane.dempsey@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:17:24 -0500
Accept-language: en-US
Acceptlanguage: en-US
Cc: <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <4F341365.3010400@xxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <B3A97B1555F0234DB864AA012D2BAF833DE7D360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F341365.3010400@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Thread-index: AcznWob/cyvBY0wVQ92H1WZQs8YuWAAm7iGw
Thread-topic: Red Hat bug 643571
Hi Eric,

Thanks a lot for your reply.



-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Sandeen [mailto:sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 09 February 2012 18:42
To: Dempsey, Shane
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Red Hat bug 643571

On 2/9/12 10:45 AM, shane.dempsey@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Hello,
> I believe Eric Sandee was working on this bug -
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643571 to resolve a
> fragmentation issue with XFS on RHEL 5.5.

> Do you know if this fix is in RHEL 6.1, kernel 2.6.32-131.0.15?

RH support is the better avenue for these questions, FWIW.

But from the comments in the bug:


is what went in;

[sandeen@sandeen linux-2.6]$ git log --pretty=oneline fs/xfs | grep 
"speculative allocation"
9f6c92b9cc2fd41d6c7b493be5637cc5b5659880 [XFS] Fix speculative allocation 
beyond eof
[sandeen@sandeen linux-2.6]$ git describe --contains 

so it went into 2.6.30, so should be present in all later kernels.

-Eric Sandeen-with-an-N ;)

> Regards,
> Shane.
> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list 
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>