xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Red Hat bug 643571

To: shane.dempsey@xxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Red Hat bug 643571
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 12:41:41 -0600
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <B3A97B1555F0234DB864AA012D2BAF833DE7D360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <B3A97B1555F0234DB864AA012D2BAF833DE7D360@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:10.0) Gecko/20120129 Thunderbird/10.0
On 2/9/12 10:45 AM, shane.dempsey@xxxxxxx wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I believe Eric Sandee was working on this bug -
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=643571 to resolve a
> fragmentation issue with XFS on RHEL 5.5.


> 
> Do you know if this fix is in RHEL 6.1, kernel 2.6.32-131.0.15?

RH support is the better avenue for these questions, FWIW.

But from the comments in the bug:

linux-2.6-fs-xfs-fix-speculative-allocation-beyond-eof.patch

is what went in;

[sandeen@sandeen linux-2.6]$ git log --pretty=oneline fs/xfs | grep 
"speculative allocation"
9f6c92b9cc2fd41d6c7b493be5637cc5b5659880 [XFS] Fix speculative allocation 
beyond eof
[sandeen@sandeen linux-2.6]$ git describe --contains 
9f6c92b9cc2fd41d6c7b493be5637cc5b5659880
v2.6.30-rc8~5^2~56

so it went into 2.6.30, so should be present in all later kernels.

-Eric Sandeen-with-an-N ;)

> 
> 
> 
> Regards,
> 
> 
> 
> Shane.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________ xfs mailing list 
> xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx http://oss.sgi.com/mailman/listinfo/xfs

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>