| To: | Tom Crane <T.Crane@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs_repair segfaults with ag_stride option |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 6 Feb 2012 09:04:29 -0500 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4F2F23F3.9000402@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4F293FCC.7010101@xxxxxxxxxx> <20120202124248.GA12107@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F2F23F3.9000402@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 12:50:59AM +0000, Tom Crane wrote: > Hi Christoph, > Many thanks for the quick response and the patch. It was a big > help. I was able to repair our 60TB FS in about 30 hours. I have a > couple of questions; > > (1) The steps in the progress report seem a little strange. See the > attachment. Is this expected? Do you mean the out of order agno progress reports? That's an artefact of the ag_stride option which parallelizes processing of different AGs, and expected. It's not very nice but I don't have a smart idea how to do much better either. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: xfs_repair segfaults with ag_stride option, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH v2 0/2] Add two SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE tests, Jeff Liu |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: xfs_repair segfaults with ag_stride option, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 0/7] better dquot caching, Christoph Hellwig |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |