On Fri, 27 Jan 2012 10:01:37 -0600 Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 11:05:33AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > On Wed, 25 Jan 2012 11:12:44 -0600 Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > Could you pull XFS updates from
> > >
> > > git://oss.sgi.com/xfs/xfs.git for-next
> > >
> > > instead of from the oss/master branch for 3.3?
> > OK, currently I fetch the "master" branch of that tree. And you want em
> > to switch to the "for-next" branch, right? (Those two branches currently
> > point to the same commit, so I have not changed yet.)
> Yep, please switch to oss/for-next instead of oss/master. I'll keep
> them in sync normally, it's just that I'd like to have a little
> flexability WRT what is in for-next.
Just to be crystal clear: there are no branches in that tree called
"oss/for-next" or "oss/master" - I assume that you are referring to the
branches called "for-next" and "master", right?
> > Did you mean "3.3", or "3.4"?
> I meant only that I'd like to try it this way for a single release, see
> how it goes, and then re-evaluate.
Ah, ok, I see.
> > Currently the contacts for that tree are: David Chinner
> > <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxxx Should I change that?
> > i.e. who has control over the tree and can fix problems if I report them?
> I think Dave's suggestion is reasonable: Keep him as a contact, add me,
> and s/xfs-masters@xxxxxxxxxxx/xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx/. It really helps that
> you two are in the same timezone. ;)
OK, I will sort all this out on Monday.
Stephen Rothwell sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Description: PGP signature