xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Insane file system overhead on large volume

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Insane file system overhead on large volume
From: Manny <dermaniac@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 27 Jan 2012 20:15:36 +0100
Cc: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=uEy9WyirNKZx/1CroLa2+GgwDSXK7Z+8BfIJ2nMjuLE=; b=btcRu8w9yxDTGFzjyCiAThDY/ZUVep709Kyt/py4AjrMAO0FrXFYJfJzC9T9a5m8Td NHoSOJoMJoq0ETzEiwlqac1c40TItkDBwtSgT8oC9+MBSuh9cHZ9bdxY20YO5UFh/dDf rYd8uWMAKMXIJr/xesgwu0ImvhghNX1i4/JBM=
In-reply-to: <20120127104413.GA12347@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CAEBWcAT2zfDskgDjFr0KcnfsT2A65r04AM1cv2-TfnNJTB1__Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120127104413.GA12347@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Where did you get the sizes for the raw volume and the filesystem usage
> from?

Oh my god, you are so right. The raw volume was actually just 24TB. My
Raid controller decided to leave 6TB on the VDisk for a Snap pool.

Thanks for the hint, and sorry to bother you

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>