| To: | ??ukasz Ole?? <lukasz.oles@xxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: reserved blocks pool default size |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Fri, 27 Jan 2012 06:40:32 -0500 |
| Cc: | xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4F22843E.4050804@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4F22843E.4050804@xxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 12:02:22PM +0100, ??ukasz Ole?? wrote: > Hi, > > I updated kernel from 2.6.27 to 2.6.35 and noticed that free size on > my xfs volume changed. Before update there was 7MB free space, now > there is none. > > After some investigation I found that default size for reserved > block pool changed [1]. > On this volume I have one very big file which is exported as iSCSI > disk via SCST and one small configuration file. The big file size > will never change. Small file size can change only by some KB. > > With this assumptions, can I revert this change and set reserved > blocks pool size to 1024 blocks? If it worked fine for your workload before it should work fine with newer kernels, too. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 0/3] xfs: change available ranges in quota check, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 0/3] xfs: change available ranges in quota check, HAYASAKA Mitsuo |
| Previous by Thread: | reserved blocks pool default size, Åukasz OleÅ |
| Next by Thread: | Re: reserved blocks pool default size, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |