xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: How to fix bad superblock or xfs_repair: error - read only 0 of 512

To: Roger Willcocks <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: How to fix bad superblock or xfs_repair: error - read only 0 of 512 bytes
From: Christian Kildau <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:10:51 +0100
Cc: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@xxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs-oss <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=unixhosts.org; s=google; h=subject:mime-version:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id:references :to:x-mailer:x-gm-message-state:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9M0lHxOI/Q83bTwQGkfj6O1QxJKzYkR+xk995OAlcdE=; b=Itofr9YUZlmewcXKHwymIaD62yy8Il4owBqNzLQeWGNwLT7fnxYC6Nedzm+PMueUay K67vBYyXPca6vyYMD/dz7gTBhYTmB93w7FWuKdiUK6S64bZjB2uBiDTVyxL1R0+n6O50 shxe/e7VMivYPq8ZUuW8kMfk0pI4MflT2VbdM=
In-reply-to: <1327425931.24535.610.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CALx8gnT9tdPRGfVR0puoSVYz_MDDs4FtWtodST5x29GDnL3A_w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20120123043117.GH15102@dastard> <92CDAC52-1BA1-43A8-8470-0E2DCD916610@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F1E3BD0.7080604@xxxxxxxxxxx> <B1F1FDAB-0D48-48FE-8FFC-F0567780E052@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1327414341.24535.582.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4D396236-D516-4948-8F43-1AED88539BC4@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F1ED341.4010108@xxxxxxxxxxx> <BE48F258-7061-468F-865E-3595D2C28B3B@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F1ED4DF.40907@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1327425931.24535.610.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
On Jan 24, 2012, at 6:25 PM, Roger Willcocks wrote:

> 
> On Tue, 2012-01-24 at 09:57 -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>> On 1/24/12 9:52 AM, Christian Kildau wrote:
>>> On Jan 24, 2012, at 4:50 PM, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>> 
> ...
>>>> Can you run the hdparm command Roger suggested on your original hard 
>>>> drive, please?
>>> 
>>> Sure, here it is:
>>> 
>>> /dev/sde:
>>> max sectors   = 2930275055/2930277168, HPA is enabled
>>                                          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>> 
>> ding ding ding, we have a winner.
>> 
>> 2930277168-2930275055 = 2113 which is about how much xfs tried to read past 
>> the end.
>> 
>> Something about the ubuntu upgrade messed with your disk.
>> 
>> I'd press them very hard to investigate & resolve that.  You can probably 
>> use hdparm
>> to remove the HPA and get your space back but this is beyond my expertise &
>> familiarity.  It'd be interesting to know what is _in_ the HPA area first.
>> 
> 
> Kernel commit d8d9129ea28e2177749627c82962feb26e8d11e9 added code to
> notice if a disk partition extends into the hidden area and 'unlocks'
> the hidden area (uses the full disk capacity) if necessary.
> 
> But if there's no partition table (the entire disk is formatted as a
> single filesystem) the heuristic can't work.
> 
> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-ide/msg40244.html suggests that
> Ubuntu no longer always unlocks, but uses the heuristic above. In the
> same message Alan Cox says Ubuntu 'made a bad mistake on that one.'
> 
> -- 
> Roger Willcocks <roger@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> 



Good to know! Made me choose another OS for the next servers!

Thanks
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>