xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: xfs: validate inode numbers in file handles correctly--NFS Stale Fil

To: yangguoquan <ygq51@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: xfs: validate inode numbers in file handles correctly--NFS Stale File Handle Again
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:58:26 -0500
Cc: hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, pengxihan@xxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <SNT135-W48F0EBD0BBCFF1CAFBF2BEA4970@xxxxxxx>
References: <1276846374-23916-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <loom.20111123T134243-580@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111123143045.GA20892@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111128111947.GA26454@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <SNT135-W2217EB3D3B80A8433A1FA4A4B70@xxxxxxx> <SNT135-W13E443B8D7BE73D5955314A4AD0@xxxxxxx> <20120102150201.GB31110@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <SNT135-W48F0EBD0BBCFF1CAFBF2BEA4970@xxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:20:31AM +0800, yangguoquan wrote:
> 
> Yes, They are mount points.
>  
> /dev/mapper/storage_pool-testnfs00 on /mnt/storage_pool/testnfs00 type xfs 
> (rw)

In that case I really have no idea.  Did you make sure you no
outstanding "old" filehandles before the fix on clients?  How do the
handles look in wireshark traces?

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>