| To: | yangguoquan <ygq51@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: xfs: validate inode numbers in file handles correctly--NFS Stale File Handle Again |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Tue, 24 Jan 2012 12:58:26 -0500 |
| Cc: | hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx, pengxihan@xxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <SNT135-W48F0EBD0BBCFF1CAFBF2BEA4970@xxxxxxx> |
| References: | <1276846374-23916-1-git-send-email-david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <loom.20111123T134243-580@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111123143045.GA20892@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111128111947.GA26454@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <SNT135-W2217EB3D3B80A8433A1FA4A4B70@xxxxxxx> <SNT135-W13E443B8D7BE73D5955314A4AD0@xxxxxxx> <20120102150201.GB31110@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <SNT135-W48F0EBD0BBCFF1CAFBF2BEA4970@xxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 10:20:31AM +0800, yangguoquan wrote: > > Yes, They are mount points. > > /dev/mapper/storage_pool-testnfs00 on /mnt/storage_pool/testnfs00 type xfs > (rw) In that case I really have no idea. Did you make sure you no outstanding "old" filehandles before the fix on clients? How do the handles look in wireshark traces? |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] xfsprogs: check for size parsing errors in xfs_quota, Eric Sandeen |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Partially corrupted raid array beneath xfs, Christopher Evans |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: xfs: validate inode numbers in file handles correctly--NFS Stale File Handle Again, yangguoquan |
| Next by Thread: | RE: xfs: validate inode numbers in file handles correctly--NFS Stale File Handle Again, yangguoquan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |