xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Optimal XFS formatting options?

To: xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Optimal XFS formatting options?
From: Michael Monnerie <michael.monnerie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 16:55:13 +0100
Cc: Peter Grandi <pg_xf2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <20249.22727.359884.733592@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization: it-management http://it-management.at
References: <33140169.post@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4F192DEC.4030400@xxxxxxxxx> <20249.22727.359884.733592@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/3.1.5-zmi; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; )
On Freitag, 20. Januar 2012 Peter Grandi wrote:
>   * There be 32b inode numbers, which limit inodes to the first
>     1TB of a filetree if sector size is 512B.
> 
>   * The 32b block IO subsystems limits partition sizes to 16TiB.

I thought those two have been removed by some updates? I think I 
remember to have read that. Not that it's too interesting, I've been 
running on 64b Linux everywhere since AMD has put it in their 
processors. Should be 10+ years or so.

-- 
mit freundlichen Grüssen,
Michael Monnerie, Ing. BSc

it-management Internet Services: Protéger
http://proteger.at [gesprochen: Prot-e-schee]
Tel: +43 660 / 415 6531

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>