| To: | Peng Haitao <penght@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests/071 FAIL with pwrite64: Invalid argument |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Wed, 4 Jan 2012 11:53:41 -0500 |
| Cc: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <4EE02022.5000403@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <4EDD8F16.4050402@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111206110533.GD28326@dastard> <4EDF2133.7030702@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111207100748.GB14273@dastard> <4EE02022.5000403@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Thu, Dec 08, 2011 at 10:25:38AM +0800, Peng Haitao wrote: > > Dave Chinner said the following on 2011-12-7 18:07: > > > > I think you misunderstand what I was saying - I was not suggesting > > removing the error messages at all, just filtering them with sed to > > ensure the output is always constant for the error different > > messages different platforms dump out. > > > > Thanks for your reply. > Sorry for misunderstanding your comments. > > I make a new patch, please review, thanks. This still fails in my 32-bit test VM: --- 071.out 2009-05-10 16:48:46.000000000 +0000 +++ 071.out.bad 2012-01-04 16:47:05.000000000 +0000 @@ -40,14 +40,14 @@ Writing 512 bytes, offset is +0 (direct=false) -pwrite64: File too large +wrote 512/512 bytes at offset <OFFSET> Reading 512 bytes (direct=false) -read 0/512 bytes at offset <OFFSET> +read 512/512 bytes at offset <OFFSET> and so on |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Another SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE tester, Christoph Hellwig |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH v2] xfstests: new check 278 to ensure btrfs backref integrity, Eric Sandeen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Another SEEK_DATA/SEEK_HOLE tester, Christoph Hellwig |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] xfstests/071 FAIL with pwrite64: Invalid argument, Peng Haitao |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |