xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: XFS updates for 3.0-stable

To: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XFS updates for 3.0-stable
From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2011 14:32:18 -0800
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=gfs3wmnzOSY79KKT5ZVPbAKpcpc=; b=TACDFCYKktCQiA6UOmoQdQowCcDP e821unum/uAQgiZ7r75CW3WVV6kazks5nuqzWq5hjL4pdn7fjQTqkrBmLeMG7saP suRGi2Xfk5b1g3k4+L8axrA8PxZd9CIX7M9vOKWuEDldddP2Vd6AmrXy4rC2Dt6I S1S9BE36Yvlt9NE=
In-reply-to: <20111212222214.GA16123@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <20111212222214.GA16123@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 05:22:14PM -0500, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Two more updates for 3.0-stable.  The first one is a simple fix that
> just went to mainline and is a real no brainer.  The second once is
> more borderline vs the stable criteria - it's very small but not a bug
> fix in the traditional sense but rather fixing an absymal low
> performance due to an errornous synchronous transaction.  This really
> shows up badly in various cloud and cluster storage scenarious, and has
> already been backported to at least on of the enterprise distribution
> kernels.

Looks good to me, thanks for the patches, all queued up now.

greg k-h

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>