xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Bad performance with XFS + 2.6.38 / 2.6.39

To: Xupeng Yun <xupeng@xxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Bad performance with XFS + 2.6.38 / 2.6.39
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:57:37 -0500
Cc: Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XFS group <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In-reply-to: <CACaf2ab-YjXAFm767MmRU5iuOmvkqQW3ZTfQewD5SGvF-opgYQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CACaf2aYZ=k=x8sPFJs4f-4vQxs+qNyoO1EUi8X=iBjWjRhy99Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111211233929.GI14273@dastard> <CACaf2aYTsxOBXEJEbQu7gwAminBc3R2usDHvypJW0AqOfnz0Pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111212010053.GM14273@dastard> <CACaf2ab-YjXAFm767MmRU5iuOmvkqQW3ZTfQewD5SGvF-opgYQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:00:18AM +0800, Xupeng Yun wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:00, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > Oh, of course, now I remember what the problem is - it's a locking
> > issue that was fixed in 3.0.11, 3.1.5 and 3.2-rc1.
> >
> 
> Got it, thanks.

Btw, I'd recommend to stay on Linux 3.0-stable instead of 2.6.38 or
2.6.39 as it will actively get all bugfixes backported for a while.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>