| To: | Xupeng Yun <xupeng@xxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Bad performance with XFS + 2.6.38 / 2.6.39 |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 12 Dec 2011 08:57:37 -0500 |
| Cc: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, XFS group <xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx> |
| In-reply-to: | <CACaf2ab-YjXAFm767MmRU5iuOmvkqQW3ZTfQewD5SGvF-opgYQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| References: | <CACaf2aYZ=k=x8sPFJs4f-4vQxs+qNyoO1EUi8X=iBjWjRhy99Q@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111211233929.GI14273@dastard> <CACaf2aYTsxOBXEJEbQu7gwAminBc3R2usDHvypJW0AqOfnz0Pg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111212010053.GM14273@dastard> <CACaf2ab-YjXAFm767MmRU5iuOmvkqQW3ZTfQewD5SGvF-opgYQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 10:00:18AM +0800, Xupeng Yun wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 09:00, Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Oh, of course, now I remember what the problem is - it's a locking > > issue that was fixed in 3.0.11, 3.1.5 and 3.2-rc1. > > > > Got it, thanks. Btw, I'd recommend to stay on Linux 3.0-stable instead of 2.6.38 or 2.6.39 as it will actively get all bugfixes backported for a while. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: XFS causing stack overflow, Ryan C. England |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] xfs_lsprojid: show quota project id for specified files, Arkadiusz MiÅkiewicz |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Bad performance with XFS + 2.6.38 / 2.6.39, Xupeng Yun |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Bad performance with XFS + 2.6.38 / 2.6.39, Yann Dupont |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |