| To: | Dave Chinner <david@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 09/16] xfs: flatten the dquot lock ordering |
| From: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> |
| Date: | Mon, 5 Dec 2011 06:50:21 -0500 |
| Cc: | Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx |
| In-reply-to: | <20111205093437.GA28326@dastard> |
| References: | <20111128082722.604873274@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111128082837.808570926@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111205050428.GP7046@dastard> <20111205091121.GA22018@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20111205093437.GA28326@dastard> |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) |
On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 08:34:37PM +1100, Dave Chinner wrote:
> Hmmmm. My unmodified tree just has the declaration without
> initialisation, and I didn't find any place where the initialisation
> was added in the preceding patches. I'll go back and have another
> look.
It's actually in this patch:
@@ -489,8 +498,8 @@ xfs_qm_dqpurge_int(
struct xfs_quotainfo *q = mp->m_quotainfo;
struct xfs_dquot *dqp, *n;
uint dqtype;
- int nrecl;
- int nmisses;
+ int nmisses = 0;
+ LIST_HEAD (dispose_list);
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 09/16] xfs: flatten the dquot lock ordering, Dave Chinner |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] security: Delay freeing inode->i_security till the end of RCU grace period, Chandra Seetharaman |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 09/16] xfs: flatten the dquot lock ordering, Dave Chinner |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 09/16] xfs: flatten the dquot lock ordering, Dave Chinner |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |