xfs
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 0/6] XFS update for 3.1-stable (again)

To: Ben Myers <bpm@xxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] XFS update for 3.1-stable (again)
From: Greg KH <greg@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 2 Dec 2011 15:12:19 -0800
Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, xfs@xxxxxxxxxxx
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-type:in-reply-to; s=smtpout; bh=MCS7h9sYSSqoPNodiiXpoksx4wU=; b=TC2Ewu+1pT+juk//Fja1WZITezRs lHqWUC5lqGQT3yMcdEBgbfb0SY1EbUg2roIV9WA00YPQLKCK2qqyRHIFlCqrxVYJ 6X+7UIj48SaMnfoUTuzYxSs2mkG+Wf5zKIn/lERcspqLQCZf/ez8rFdvV9IxGn36 jlPHglmsGXjeCsM=
In-reply-to: <20111201233302.GA5573@xxxxxxxxx>
References: <1322782064-1723-1-git-send-email-bpm@xxxxxxx> <20111201233302.GA5573@xxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 03:33:02PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 01, 2011 at 05:27:38PM -0600, Ben Myers wrote:
> > This is a series of XFS fixes from current mainline which is important for
> > 3.1-stable.  Note that it is the same patch set that Christoph submitted for
> > 3.0-stable, minus the first three patches which are already included in 3.1.
> > 
> > My QA came out ok with these six patches atop 3.1.y.  I've been having 
> > trouble
> > getting mail out to stable@vger, but it seems to be working now.  Apologies 
> > to
> > those who are getting this mail yet again.
> 
> Nice, I got all of these, thanks.  I'll queue them up in a few days when
> I get caught up on the stable patch queue.

All applied.

Any reason why you only signed off on the last patch, and not the others
you sent me?  Just curious.

greg k-h

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>